• Lanius phoenicuroides: Iran to Pakistan, s Kazakhstan and extreme w China (w Xinjiang)

Sources recognizing this taxon

Avibase taxonomic concepts (current): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Avibase taxonomic concepts v. 01 (August 2013): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Avibase taxonomic concepts v. 02 (May 2014): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Avibase taxonomic concepts v. 03 (March 2015): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Avibase taxonomic concepts v. 04 (Aug 2016): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Avibase taxonomic concepts v. 05 (Jan 2017): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Avibase taxonomic concepts v. 06 (Feb 2018): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Avibase taxonomic concepts v. 07 (Feb 2020): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Birdlife checklist version 09 (Dec 2016): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Birdlife checklist version 09.1 (Jun 2017): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

HBW and BirdLife Taxonomic Checklist v2 (Dec 2017): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

HBW and BirdLife Taxonomic Checklist v3 (Nov 2018): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

HBW and BirdLife Taxonomic Checklist v4 (Dec 2019): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

HBW and BirdLife Taxonomic Checklist v5 (Dec 2020): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Clements 5th edition (as published): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 5th edition (incl. 2000 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 5th edition (incl. 2001 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 5th edition (incl. 2002 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 5th edition (incl. 2003 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 5th edition (incl. 2004 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 5th edition (incl. 2005 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition: Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (incl. 2007 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (incl. 2008 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (incl. 2009 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (version 6.5 incl. 2010 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (version 6.6 incl. 2011 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (version 6.7 incl. 2012 revisions): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (version 6.8 incl. 2013 revisions): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Clements 6th edition (version 6.9 incl. 2014 revisions): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Clements, version 2015: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Clements, version 2016: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Clements, version 2017: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Clements, version 2018: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Clements, version 2019: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 1.52: Rufous-tailed Shrike (Turkestan) (Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 1.53: Rufous-tailed Shrike (Turkestan) (Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 1.54: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 1.55: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 2015: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 2016: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 2017: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 2018: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

eBird version 2019: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Howard and Moore 2nd edition: Lanius collurio phoenicuroides

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (as published): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 1.2): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 2.1): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 3.1): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 4): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 5): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 6): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 7): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 3rd edition (incl.corrigenda 8): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Howard and Moore 4th edition (vol. 1-2): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Howard and Moore 4th edition (incl.corrigenda vol. 1-2): Turkestan Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Handbook of the Birds of the World (vol 1-16): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive (01/31/2015): Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides [version 1]

Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive (03/07/2017): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Handbook of the Birds of the World and Birdlife (Dec 2017): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Handbook of the Birds of the World and Birdlife (Dec 2018): Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 1.6: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 1.7: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.0: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.3: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.4: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.5: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.6: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.7: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.8: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.9: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.10: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 2.11: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 3.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 3.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 3.3: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 3.4: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 3.5: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 4.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 4.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 4.3: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 4.4: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 5.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 5.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 5.3: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 5.4: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 6.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 6.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 6.3: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 6.4: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 7.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 7.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 7.3: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 8.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 8.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 9.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 9.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 10.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 10.2: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

IOC World Bird Names, version 11.1: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

James Lee Peters (original): Lanius collurio phoenicuroides [version 1]

James Lee Peters (2nd edition): Lanius collurio phoenicuroides [version 1]

Working Group Avian Checklists, version 0.01: Red-tailed Shrike (Lanius phoenicuroides) [version 1]

Zoonomen - Zoological Nomenclature Resource: Lanius phoenicuroides [version 1]

Taxonomic status:

View status: full species (sometimes a subspecies)

This taxon is a subspecies of Lanius [isabellinus, arenarius or phoenicuroides] (sensu lato) by some authors

Zhabagly

2021-03-06 | Alexander Goncharov

02/20/2021. Novorossiysk - bay and lagoon.

2021-03-06 | Svetlana Baskakova

Ordabasy - Koksaray reservoir

2021-03-03 | Alexander Goncharov

Novorossiysk. 02/19/2021.

2021-03-08 | Askar Isabekov

Happy March 8!

2021-03-02 | Alexander Goncharov

Novorossiysk. 02/18/2021.

2021-02-25 | Svetlana Baskakova

February. So that is all !

2021-03-02 | Askar Isabekov

Classification

I join the Ardea question.
Here's what they write in modern taxonomic lists:

The code

The code

The code

And there is also such an interesting "tree" on the avibase:

The code

Quote
shahin writes: The phrase "not bothering" is key here. smile :) So, if you do not bother, then you will not move forward. smile,)

This is only partly true, but it is incorrect in principle, from a dialectical point of view. It is possible to move forward "bothering" only up to a certain limit, after which superhuman efforts will be required for further progress, that is, a stop (for the inhuman is beyond the power of man). That is why classical mechanics first appeared, and only then, when it became a routine, on the one hand, and on the other, it stopped answering the newly emerging questions, did other mechanics appear (quantum, relativistic, etc.). It seems that in ornithology (and in biology, in general), we have not yet matured even to the "classics". We know too little, the methods of research are too imperfect, the object is too complex.
The "further into the woods", the more and more I do not understand how you can study something "without agreeing" on the criteria? Indeed, even in the "peer-to-peer" species classification, nonsense arises. It is clear that it is impossible to differentiate to species only by morphological, geographic, ecological, etc. characters.
What about the facts of hybridization between species of a genus group with fertile offspring? What happens next with the offspring? Degeneration to the species of one of the ancestors, most likely. but why, in this case, they speak of two species of the same genus, when "logically" these are two subspecies of the same species.
Mess!

The "further into the forest", the more and more I do not understand how you can study something "without agreeing" on the criteria? Indeed, even in the "peer-to-peer" species classification, nonsense arises. It is clear that it is impossible to differentiate to species only by morphological, geographic, ecological, etc. characters.

What about the facts of hybridization between species of a genus group with fertile offspring? What happens next with the offspring? Degeneration to the species of one of the ancestors, most likely. but why, in this case, they speak of two species of the same genus, when "logically" these are two subspecies of the same species.